<

Thursday, July 14, 2005

Poll suggests drop in Bush's personal credibility

I'm sure you won't hear about this on THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL.

Well, it would appear that the alarm clock has started to go off and the proverbial "WAKE UP CALL” has come for the other 51% that was to misguide, uninformed or just to plain stupid to see what the rest of us GLARINGLY saw about this lying clown. Hell, he didn’t even get a bounce from the London Bombings. Nope, no amount of invoking 911 is gonna bail him out this time. The RED STATE Rubes now see, that for the most part, Iraq is "RICH MAN'S WAR, POOR MAN'S FIGHT" kinda war based on lies for the sake of Corporate Profiteering and Vendetta.

To continue with Rove. Here is the heading of an article from the AP yesterday "“ Bush Passes on Public Endorsement of Rove”. So even Bush is wary about giving his support in public to his “POLITICAL SVENGALI”. This doesn’t bode well for the wonder boy,any other time Bush would not hesitate. Maybe, Rove’s long road of bad Karma has finally caught up to him and Bush knows that soon he’s going to have to pull the plug on his evil chubby little buddy…the sharks are circling.

The Right has viciously taken the fight to Valerie Plame and her husband Wilson playing the old “ROVIAN” game of character assassination to deflect any inquiry and criticism of the Rove and his motives for outing Valerie Plame. These administration Sycophants even have the audacity to claim that the Machiavellian poster boy is some how a hero. Now you want to talk about a “conceptual non sequitur”, this is one. It would appear that the Neo Buddhist saying, “you can only piss in the Karmic stream of life so long before you gotta drink from it”, is true. It looks like the “Republican Smearmeister” is about to take a big long Gulp!

Either way the word around the belt way is that the investigation will be wrapping up soon and if Rove is indicted what will Bush and the rabid right do? Will Bush carry out his promise to fire anyone that had a hand in the outing of Plame or will he continue dragging his heels and stall to protect Rove? Will the Right admit that Rove compromised National Security or will it continue to play the spin/smear game and proclaim it’s all a Liberal Left partisan ploy? Soon we shall have the answer.

At any rate it is going to be one helluva long four years for the man from Crawford. Four long years spent spinning and parading a continuous new set of lies and half-truths to explain the setbacks. The vast majority of the administrations time from here on out will be spent on damage control as Iraq continues it’s aimless spiral into Quagmire, the administration is unable to come up with a viable exit strategy, and the scandals keep continuing to the surface one after the other. With a little over six months into the second Bush administration any so called “MANDATE” from the elections has been totally pissed away and all political capital spent. That quacking sound you hear is not from the Mallards heading south early this year. It’s time for those Republicans running for reelection in ’06 to start to distance themselves from this sinking ship before the subsequent whirlpool that follows sucks them to the bottom also.

JOE SMOE: AMERICAN CITIZEN

14 Comments:

Blogger Suzie Housecoat said...

Sooo, according to this poll "the other 51%" are now against Bush? I did miss that piece of news, since I get my information from The Fox News Channel and not the Daily Show with Jon Stewart.
This blog is staring to remind me of the Kerry campaign - I keep asking straight-forward questions and I keep getting NO ANSWERS. Oh well, I'll give it another shot.

Here's a little quiz:
1. At the end of 1945, what was the US exit strategy for Germany and Japan?
2. Regarding the Pat B. article: America has a military presence in England, Germany, Japan, the Phillipines and many other countries. How many non-muslims have blown-up innocent civilians to get Americans out of their lands?
3. Rove "outed" the fact that Wilson was not sent to Niger by the VP, but was recommended by his wife, a CIA employee. Didn't mention her name. In what ways was "national sercurity" compromised?
Good Luck!

Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:16:00 AM  
Blogger Joe Smoe: American Citizen said...

Suzie,
No answers huh? Kinda like the press corp. hammering Scott M. and him stonewalling.
I get my news and info from a myriad of source some left and some right hence the P.B. article and a lot from the outside of the US as the news outlets here have been compromised by corporate interests.
Your pals support is being eroded and will continue to erode from the majority that gave him the election that is now obvious.

The one non muslim attack that comes to mind was Oklahoma City. Mcvey as I remember was not a Muslem. Also, there is an insurgency in the Phillipines opreating now. The reason,we are being attacked through our allies is that they supported our misguided lie based war in Iraq. Moslems don't like to see over 100,000 other moslems die for no other reason than for conquest. As far as WW2, we were attack and had to kick ass. Where and when did Iraq attack us? And we rebuilt them cause we destroyed them.

Don't be coy. Rove outted her by stating that she was the wife of Wilson. One and one equals two. You republicans have a hard time with the math when you don't like the outcome of the equation.

Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:38:00 AM  
Blogger Suzie Housecoat said...

Look, Joe . . . if you have some kind of learning disability, then it's okay, really. I understand that reading comprehension is a challenge for a lot of people. Let me try to help you:

1. I asked about non-muslim bombers trying to get Americans to leave foreign lands. Can you see why "Tim McVeigh" was the wrong answer?

2. The insurgency (you really love that word) in the Phillipines is Islamic. Again, doesn't really address my question.

3. And how was it again that Rove compromised national security?

Finally, if the terrorists attacks are the fault of George Bush and our mission is Iraq, please explain what happened on 9/11, the planning for which began before Bush was even a candidate.

Thursday, July 14, 2005 1:27:00 PM  
Blogger Suzie Housecoat said...

One more thing . . .
You say that the reason for the attacks is that "Moslems don't like to see over 100,000 other Moslems die for no reason . . ."

So they respond by killing the Muslim envoy from Egypt? By killing scores of Muslim Iraqis with car bombs? By blowing-up Muslim children getting candy from soldiers? By killing Muslims going to work in London and New York? Not to mention killing the young Muslim men who die when the bombs they're wearing explode?

You are saying that Muslims are so upset by the killing of Muslims in the name of "conquest" that they respond by killing more Muslims?!?!

Does that really make sense to you? Do you really hate George Bush so much that you're willing to be an apologist for that kind of insanity?

Thursday, July 14, 2005 1:51:00 PM  
Blogger Riaz said...

HERE IS A LITTLE ANSWER TO YOUR QUIZ FOR SMOE

Here's a little quiz:
1. At the end of 1945, what was the US exit strategy for Germany and Japan?
THE EXIT STRATEGY WAS WHEN THE THESE GOVENMENTS SURRENDERED! - YOU REALLY THINK HELPING OUR ALLIES OR DEFEATING JAPAN IS COMPARIBLE TO INVADIND IRAQ! - "YOU GOT YOUR HEAD UP YOUR YOU KNOW WHAT!" OH BY THE WAY SADAM DID SURRENDER! - AND YOUR TEXAS NERO IS STILL THRERE! BUILDING BASES - OR MAYBE THE FOX CHANNEL HAVEN'T TOLD YOU THIS?

IN 1945 AND THEREAFTER, WE WERE NOT THE WORLDS MOST HATED COUNTRY - OR DID YOU FORGET ABOUT THAT! - OH YEA ACCORDING TO YOUR TEXAS NERO - THEY HATE US BECAUSE THEY HATE OR FREEDOM- THANKS TO NERO WE ARE THE MOST HATED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD EVEN AMONGS OUR FRIENDS IN CANADA AND THE UK! - OH YEA I FORGOT WE ARE FIGHT FREEDOM (I GUESS THE IRAQIES WERE GOING TAKE OUR FREEDOM AWAY!)

2. Regarding the Pat B. article: America has a military presence in England, Germany, Japan, the Philippines and many other countries. How many non-Muslims have blown-up innocent civilians to get Americans out of their lands?
OF COURSE LET US BLAME IT ON THE MUSLIMS - THEY HATE OUR FREEDOM AS YOUR TEXAN NERO KEEPS SAYING! - I GUESS THEY HATE US BECAUSE THEY ARE MUSLIMS – IF THEY WEREN’T MUSLIM THEY WOULDN’T HATE US – OR MAYBE THAT IS WHY WE SUPPORT ISREAL IN OCCUPYING THEIR LAND! - LET US (U.S AND ISREAL) CONVERT THEM ALL INTO JEWS OR CHRISTIANS –THEN THEY WOULDN’T HATE US!

IF YOU HAD ANY GUTS OR BRAINS YOU WOULD TRY TO ACTUALLY READ WHAT A SECULAR MUSLIM WOULD SAY - I SUGGEST YOU READ THIS
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/25D45C98-471B-4A36-8253-F2120BEA180F.htm

SHOW IT TO YOUR NAZZI FRIENDS MAYBE THEY WILL LEARN SOMETHING!
3. Rove "ousted" the fact that Wilson was not sent to Niger by the VP, but was recommended by his wife, a CIA employee. Didn't mention her name. In what ways was "national security" compromised?
OF COURSE HE DIDN'T MENTION THAT WILSON'S WIFE WORKS FOR THE CIA! AND ALL THE FACTS THAT WILSON BROUGHT ABOUT WERE LIES" RIGHT – THERE WAS INDEED WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRUCTIONS AND NERO WAS RIGHT!! SO LET US KILL 100,000 MUSLIM CITIZENS- THEY ARE MUSLIM ANYWAY AND THEY HATE US!
YEA THE TEXAS NERO FOUND LOT OF NULCEAR WEAPONS! OR MABYE WE AER FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM! NOW AND THERE WAS NO NUCLEAR ISSUE!

YOUR KIND IS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY! - YOU EQUATE FACTS THAT ARE NOT RELATED TO EACH OTHER BY JUSTIFYING YOUR ARGUEMENT! - LIKE COMPARING WW11 TO INVADING IRAQ - OR WILSON LIED ABOUT WHO SENT HIM SO HIS CONCLUSION THAT THERE ARE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRUCITON ARE WRONG!

ALL I CAN SAY IS YOU KIND WITH YOUR "TEXAN NERO IS IN CHARGE NOW! - JUST WATCH AND SEE HOW CONFIDENT AND CONTENT THOSE HOW ACTUALLY VOTED FOR "NERO" WILL FEEL IN THE UPCOMMING MONTHS!

QUIT STICKING YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND! AND WAKE UP AND WATCH YOUR NERO PLAY THE FIDDLE AND SEE THE "AMERICAN EMPIRE" GO UP IN SMOKE!

Friday, July 15, 2005 2:39:00 PM  
Blogger Suzie Housecoat said...

Hello? Joe?
Does your lack of commentary on the events of the day indicate:
A) My logical and well written rhetoric has finally turned you away from the dark side
OR
B) You've simply abondoned me out here in cyber space with the two loons from San Francisco?

As the self-appointed spokesperson for the blogosphere (or at least of the insurgency wing), you really should be rallying your troops. Wait! What's that whoosing sound? Could it be the wind leaving the sails of the Democratic party?

Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:45:00 PM  
Blogger Joe Smoe: American Citizen said...

Suzie,
Firstly, those loons are fellow Americans that have an opinion just like you but more informed and less brainwashed. I have ceased labeling and abusing you with names and statements about you and your red state mullet, but if you want to go down that path I will be more than willing to give you all my abusive Northeastern upbringing will muster. Let me assure you that you will loose given the lack of real grey matter that you have demonstrated so far. Should you really be labeling these people as always thought you bible bangers were supposed to be kind to all, but then again they disagree with you and your GODLY Commander in Liar

Secondly, I was out of town on business and I will be posting shortly given all the bad press your half-witted commander in chief has had this passed week. Also, as I said I have a job. You strike me as a Young Republican/ wet behind the ears/college punk with nothing else to do, but troll the web and stir the pot. That will all change when the draft comes back after the next Terror attack on American soil. I will be posting soon. So sit back and drink a few with your REDSTATE.org pals and exchange Mullet care tips and wait. Let me say that this current attack in Britain will be the last straw for the British people and their support for that Cluster in Iraq. The Brits will be out within the year. You can hold me to that one.

Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:34:00 AM  
Blogger Joe Smoe: American Citizen said...

And another thing my uninformed snot nosed friend.... There is no way in hell that you and the rest of those Republican/Neocon shills at REDSTATE.org would tolerate the tone of comments such as yours especially if they were from me or anyone that disagreed with you and your twisted view of the REAL WORLD. I suggest you modify this or we here at WWW.ACONCEPTUALKICKINTHEASS.blogspot.com will be more than willing to relegate your subsequent posts to the delete bin of cyberspace..as you would do to us. You have been forewarned

Thursday, July 21, 2005 12:28:00 PM  
Blogger Suzie Housecoat said...

Whoa! What EXACTLY did I say to deserve that? First of all, redstate.org is not my site nor do I have any control over their editorial policy. That would be like me assuming that just because your e-mail address ends in "yahoo.com" that you have some control over what they post and don't post.
And as for my tone, I've really looked back at my postings and the only "name calling" I've done is to use the words "apologist" and "loon." (And, okay, maybe the learning disabled comment was in bad taste). But come on - compared to what you, and riaz and beach boy have said about my side in general and me in particular?! Geez! I think you came back from what must have been an unpleasant trip and just SLAMMED me . . . and not even on the issues I tried to raise.
I think I've done a lot to try and bring some genuine counter-point to this site, but if you just want to "preach to the choir" then that's your right.
But when you call a site a "conceptual kick in the ass" then it indicates that you want to change people's concepts - that requires some back-and-forth and won't be accomplished by posting just to those who already see things the same way you do.

Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:24:00 PM  
Blogger Joe Smoe: American Citizen said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:02:00 PM  
Blogger Joe Smoe: American Citizen said...

Cut the crap!! You know exactly what I'm talking about.

Anyway, here is one for you. With the second attack on British soil what will the Brits do now? Whatever they do it will happen quickly.Make a prediction and we will see who is right.

Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:05:00 PM  
Blogger Suzie Housecoat said...

I don't think there will be any decrease in troop commitments in Iraq - not between now and 2006. In fact, I think the polls will show a stronger support for the war on terror than ever before among the British people.

Think of it this way . . .
If the Brits shared your view, then in WWII they would have cried, "Oh no! Stupid Churchill made Hitler mad and now we're getting blitzed. We should have never gotten involved in what's happening on the continent."
On the contrary, they fought even harder after the Germans started beating the crap out of them because the Nazis had revealed themselves as the ruthless bastards they truly were . . . just as the facist wing of Islam is doing now.

Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:18:00 PM  
Blogger Suzie Housecoat said...

This is in response to the "cut the crap" posting as well as the previous complete profile you've put together of me, my hair, my religion, et al:

Since you are more familiar with the redstate posting rules than I am (I finally had a chance to check out the link), and want to apply them to me, then maybe you should consider applying this guideline as well:

"Leave your assumptions at the door. You do not know any of these people, you do not know their backgrounds, and you do not know what they may have done in their lives. . . refrain from assuming anything about what positions your fellow bloggers might hold."

Thursday, July 21, 2005 4:39:00 PM  
Blogger Joe Smoe: American Citizen said...

Now your talking ..about the issues that is. If it is found that more homegrown Islamic Whackos were at the bottom of this, the Brits will Clampdown on all those clowns internally and refuse to let anymore of them in and the deportations will begin in earnest. You have to remember that the Brits were at war with the IRA for decades and there Modus Operandi was similar to the Jihadists. Also, the Brits already believe that Blair and his policy of supporting the west helped to light the fuse on these clowns. The Mayor of London even said so. The English will not stand for this crap,but they will, unlike us, look at the cause and effect of it all and will come to the conclusion that Blair and his support of Bush and the Iraq war has inflamed it all, thus Blair’s political demise is almost certain now as is the British withdrawal from Iraq.

Joe

Friday, July 22, 2005 5:40:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home